Summary
Editor's rating
Value: cheap entry into PS3 games and Blu-ray, but not for everyone
Design: low-key black box that fits anywhere
Controllers & battery: good feel, mediocre cable situation
Durability: better track record than Xbox 360, but age is a factor
Performance: good enough for PS3-era games, obviously dated now
What you actually get with this 320 GB PS3 Slim
Pros
- 320 GB drive offers plenty of space for PS3 installs and saves
- Built-in Blu-ray player with solid 1080p playback and 3D support
- Free basic online play on PSN and huge cheap used game library
Cons
- Aged hardware: slow load times and no support for modern 4K or newer games
- Condition and longevity depend heavily on how well the used unit was maintained
- Outdated streaming/app support; not ideal as a modern media box
Specifications
View full product page →| Brand | PlayStation |
| ASIN | B003VUO6LU |
| Release date | October 28, 2010 |
| Customer Reviews | 4.1 4.1 out of 5 stars (1,403) 4.1 out of 5 stars |
| Best Sellers Rank | #18,372 in Video Games (See Top 100 in Video Games) #10 in PlayStation 3 Consoles #45 in PlayStation Consoles |
| Product Dimensions | 16 x 6 x 18 inches; 5 Pounds |
| Type of item | Video Game |
| Language | English |
Old but not dead: is a PS3 Slim still worth it?
I picked up a used Sony PlayStation 3 Slim 320 GB recently, mainly out of nostalgia and because I wanted a cheap Blu‑ray player and a way to replay some old PS3 exclusives. This is the 320 GB charcoal black model, the one that was positioned as the bigger‑drive version back in 2010. Obviously it’s discontinued now, so you’re buying it used or refurbished, not new off the shelf.
Going in, I wasn’t expecting miracles. It’s a console from the PS3/Xbox 360 era, so no 4K, no modern apps, and some online features are basically a bonus if they still work. I wanted three things: play PS3 discs reliably, handle Blu‑ray movies without hiccups, and have enough storage so I don’t have to constantly delete installs and saves.
After some days of actual use – gaming, streaming what still works, and using it as a media box – it’s clear this machine is dated but still pretty solid at the basics. It’s not going to compete with a PS4 or PS5, but if you set your expectations correctly, it does its job without too much drama.
If you’re wondering whether it’s worth buying one in 2026, the short answer is: it depends heavily on why you want it. As a cheap retro/BD box, it’s fine. As your only main console today, I’d think twice. I’ll break down the good and the annoying parts below.
Value: cheap entry into PS3 games and Blu-ray, but not for everyone
Value is where this console either makes sense or not at all, depending on what you want. Used prices jump around a lot, but generally a PS3 Slim 320 GB costs way less than a used PS4, and a fraction of a PS5. For that money, you get a working Blu‑ray player, a big library of cheap used PS3 games, and free basic online play. If your goal is to replay older exclusives like Uncharted, God of War III, Gran Turismo 5/6, or just have a secondary console in a bedroom, it’s pretty solid value.
Where the value drops is if you’re thinking of this as your main console in 2026. A lot of newer games never came to PS3, online support for some titles is gone, and streaming apps either don’t work or are clunky compared to a modern smart TV or streaming stick. You’re basically buying into a past generation. For the same or slightly more money, you could grab a used PS4, which gives you a much more current library and better performance.
Storage-wise, the 320 GB drive is okay and saves you from swapping hard drives immediately, which is nice. You can upgrade it to a bigger 2.5" HDD or SSD if you really want, but for most people it’s enough as‑is. Controllers and accessories can add to the cost though: if the included DualShock 3 is worn out, a replacement isn’t super cheap, and optional stuff like extra controllers, charging docks, or a remote will bump the total price up.
So, in plain terms: it’s good value if you specifically want a PS3 for its game library or as a cheap Blu‑ray/retro box. It’s mediocre value if you’re just looking for “a console to play modern games” and don’t care which generation. In that case, I’d say skip it and go up to at least a PS4. As long as you know what you’re buying it for, the price usually feels fair.
Design: low-key black box that fits anywhere
The PS3 Slim 320 GB looks exactly like the other Slim models: matte charcoal black plastic, rounded edges, and a fairly low profile. Compared to the original fat PS3, this one is lighter and takes up less space on a TV stand. It’s not pretty or flashy by today’s standards, but it blends in well. If you want something that doesn’t scream “gaming PC tower” in your living room, this does the job.
The disc drive is a front‑loading slot, which I prefer over those cheap-feeling flip‑top designs on some old consoles. You just slide the disc in and it grabs it. The power and eject buttons are physical (not the annoying touch buttons from the first PS3), and they respond reliably. On the front you’ve got two USB ports, which is a bit limiting if you want to charge multiple controllers and plug in a USB drive, but it’s manageable with a cheap USB hub.
Noise-wise, my unit is quieter than most old Xbox 360s I’ve owned. The fan ramps up a bit after long sessions, but it’s more of a soft whoosh than a loud whine. You’ll hear the drive when it spins up a disc, especially older or slightly scratched ones, but it’s not unbearable. If you keep it in a closed cabinet with bad airflow, expect more fan noise, so give it some breathing room.
One thing I’ll say: you can tell it’s an older design when you put it next to a PS4 Slim or PS5. The UI and physical styling feel dated, but not in a terrible way. It’s just a simple black box that gets out of the way. For a used console, I’d rather have this practical design than some weird glossy fingerprint magnet. As long as the seller cleaned it and the vents aren’t packed with dust, it’s perfectly fine.
Controllers & battery: good feel, mediocre cable situation
The console itself doesn’t have a battery, but the DualShock 3 controller does, and that’s a big part of the experience. The DualShock 3 is light, wireless, and still feels fine in the hand, even compared to newer controllers. It’s not as chunky as a DualShock 4 or Xbox pad, but for long sessions it’s comfortable enough. The analog sticks are a bit looser than modern ones, but you get used to it quickly.
Battery life on the DualShock 3 is pretty decent. On my used controller, a full charge gives me roughly 15–20 hours of play, depending on vibration and how often I’m actually gaming. If you’re coming from newer controllers that you have to charge every few nights, this one doesn’t feel bad at all. The downside is the charging situation: it uses a mini‑USB cable (not micro‑USB, not USB‑C), so you either rely on the short cable in the box or buy a longer one. The cable Sony included back in the day was laughably short, so if you plan to play while charging, just grab a cheap 3–6 ft cable online.
One annoyance: there’s no separate “play and charge” battery pack system like on older Xbox 360 controllers, so if the internal battery dies after years of use, you either replace the battery yourself (doable but a bit fiddly) or replace the whole controller. On a used console, the controller battery health is a lottery. My unit’s battery is fine; a friend’s used PS3 came with a controller that barely held a charge. So factor in the possible cost of a new or refurbished DualShock 3 if the included one is tired.
Overall, the wireless experience is okay. The controller connects quickly, stays connected, and doesn’t randomly drop out. It charges from the front USB ports, so you don’t need any fancy dock unless you want one. I’d rate the whole controller/battery situation as decent: not great, not terrible, just something you might need to invest an extra few bucks into depending on the condition of the used gear you get.
Durability: better track record than Xbox 360, but age is a factor
Durability was one of the main reasons I was comfortable buying a PS3 Slim in 2026. Compared to the old Xbox 360 red ring mess, PS3 Slims generally held up better over time. I’ve owned a launch fat PS3 and now this Slim. The fat one lasted for years before I retired it, and this Slim, despite its age, boots quickly, reads discs, and hasn’t shown any scary errors so far.
That said, you’re dealing with hardware that’s 10+ years old. Components like the Blu‑ray drive, fan, and hard drive can fail purely due to age. The unit I bought was clearly cleaned and refurbished: vents were dust‑free, casing didn’t feel grimy, and the fan noise was reasonable. If you buy from a random seller who just pulled it out of a closet, you might get a dust‑choked console that overheats and crashes after an hour. So the seller’s refurb quality matters a lot more at this point than Sony’s original build quality.
The moving part most likely to go is the disc drive. So far mine hasn’t chewed any discs and reads both games and movies without complaints. I tested a couple of slightly scratched DVDs and PS3 games and they all loaded. Still, you’re gambling a bit with any optical drive this old. If disc games are your main goal, I’d test it hard in the first week: run it for several hours, swap discs, and listen for weird grinding or constant loud seeking.
Physically, the shell and buttons hold up well. The matte plastic hides scratches better than the old glossy fat model. As long as you don’t drop it or block the vents, it should keep going. I’d say durability is pretty solid for its age, but I wouldn’t pretend it’s bulletproof. Go in expecting “old but serviceable” and you’ll be fine. If you want something worry‑free for the next 5–7 years, you’re better off with a newer console.
Performance: good enough for PS3-era games, obviously dated now
In terms of raw performance, you need to remember this is a PS3, not a PS4 or PS5. For native PS3 games, it runs them as intended. I tested a mix: Gran Turismo 5, Uncharted 2, Red Dead Redemption, and a couple of Call of Duty titles. Once the games are installed and patched, they run smoothly enough for that generation. Frame rates are what they were back then; don’t expect locked 60 fps everywhere, because the games themselves were never built for that on this hardware.
Loading times are where you really feel the age. A lot of PS3 games install data to the hard drive the first time you launch them, and that can take several minutes, especially with something heavy like Gran Turismo. After that, loading is better but still slower than what you’re used to on a PS4 with an SSD, let alone a PS5. It’s not broken, just slower. If you’re patient and treat it like an older machine, it’s fine. If you’re used to instant resume and super fast load times, it’ll feel sluggish.
The system menus themselves are reasonably snappy for what it is. The XMB (cross media bar) is basic but reacts quickly enough when you’re scrolling through games, settings, and media. Installing digital games is slower than on newer systems, partly due to older hard drive speeds and slower downloads. Also, the built‑in Wi‑Fi is okay for updates, but it’s not on the same level as modern 5 GHz Wi‑Fi. If you care about download speed, plug in Ethernet.
For Blu‑ray playback, performance is actually still quite decent. Discs load in a reasonable time, and playback is smooth. I had no stutter or audio sync issues. So as a 1080p movie player and PS3 game machine, it gets the job done. Just don’t buy it expecting anything beyond 1080p or modern streaming app performance. For what it’s built for, I’d call the performance solid but obviously dated.
What you actually get with this 320 GB PS3 Slim
This specific model is basically the classic PS3 Slim with a bigger hard drive: 320 GB advertised, about 298 GB usable once the system reserves its space. That’s enough to install a decent number of games, store saves, and keep a few movies or music files if you still use it like that. For a console of this age, the capacity is totally fine unless you plan to hoard a massive digital library.
In terms of features, you get a built‑in Blu‑ray player (including 3D Blu‑ray if you care), Wi‑Fi, Ethernet, HDMI output up to 1080p, and access to PSN for online play and digital downloads. PSN on PS3 is still free for basic online, which is nice, but keep in mind some services and apps have been shut down or are limited compared to what they were in 2010–2015. Stuff like Netflix used to be a big selling point; now, depending on region and updates, support can be spotty or gone. So I wouldn’t buy it as a streaming box in 2026.
What you get in the box will depend on the seller. Originally it came with one DualShock 3 controller, a USB charging cable, power cable, and composite AV cable (no HDMI by default back then). Many refurb sellers now throw in an HDMI cable, but don’t bank on it unless it’s clearly listed. Same for extra games – those are just seller bonuses, not standard. My unit came with one controller, power, HDMI, and that’s it, which is enough to get started.
Overall, as a package, it still covers the basics: disc games, Blu‑ray, local media playback, and some remaining online features. Nothing fancy, nothing modern, but for the price I paid compared to a used PS4, it felt like a fair deal as a secondary console and movie player.
Pros
- 320 GB drive offers plenty of space for PS3 installs and saves
- Built-in Blu-ray player with solid 1080p playback and 3D support
- Free basic online play on PSN and huge cheap used game library
Cons
- Aged hardware: slow load times and no support for modern 4K or newer games
- Condition and longevity depend heavily on how well the used unit was maintained
- Outdated streaming/app support; not ideal as a modern media box
Conclusion
Editor's rating
The Sony PlayStation 3 Slim 320 GB in 2026 is basically a reliable old workhorse. It plays PS3 games the way they were meant to be played, handles Blu‑ray movies well, and the 320 GB drive gives you enough room to avoid constant deleting. The design is simple, the fan noise is reasonable, and the DualShock 3 is still comfortable to use. For a secondary console or a dedicated retro/movie box, it does its job without any drama.
On the flip side, it’s clearly an old machine. Load times are slow compared to anything modern, the app ecosystem is outdated, and some online features and services have either shut down or feel clunky. You’re also gambling a bit with hardware age: disc drives and controller batteries won’t last forever, especially on units that weren’t well cared for. If you want a main console for current games, this is the wrong pick. A used PS4 or Xbox One makes more sense.
So who is this for? It’s for people who specifically want to replay PS3‑era titles, need a cheap Blu‑ray player with bonus gaming, or just like having an older console around. If you expect modern performance and features, you’ll be disappointed. If you treat it as what it is – a solid last‑gen machine – it’s pretty decent value.